|
Big
Bang: what Banged?
Black holes and the Planck
wall
I answered to this question:
Physics major question: Big Bang: What Banged?
New black hole theory: I applied the quantum mechanics
limits to gravitation.
Black holes:
What do we know about black holes?
A black hole is born when a massive star reaches the end of
its life, the energy it is producing is no longer sufficient to prevent the
mass of the star from collapsing in on itself under its own gravitational pull,
collapsing until all the space between the individual particles is squeezed out
and it is essentially a homogeneous ball a tiny fraction of the size of the
original star; a region having a specific mass within (what appears to be) a
given volume that vanishes to 0 at the gravitational singularity.
A gravitational singularity is a place where the known laws
of the universe break down, is a "solution" to Einstein's theory of
gravitation; a "singularity" of zero volume that contained infinite density, infinite energy
and where general relativity predicts a region of infinite curvature. Event
horizon is the name given to rs (Schwarzschild radius), because from
that radius the escape velocity from the black hole's gravity is the speed of
light.
Anyway Einstein's equations are only a partial description
of reality, what is missing is a theory that integrates gravity with quantum
mechanics.
In my view the black hole singularity, event horizon does
not exist, because the maximum density at the core of the black hole (only for
gigantic black hole) is the Planck density. We can't describe physics at
densities higher than the Planck density in the quantum world!
Not good news for time traveler trough a black hole: inside the black holes you are squeezed and fried.
A supercritical mass cannot explode, because it is
gravitationally bound and it has no more thermonuclear energy to release like
the stars.
The Chandra X-ray Observatory confirms the theory that black
holes can help form massive stars and gives more support to the idea that black
holes play a big role in galaxy formation.
In the core of the Milky Way galaxy is a supermassive black
hole with 2.6 million times the mass of our Sun.
The solar mass, It is equal to the mass of the Sun, MSUN = 1.98×1030 kg
This means the mass of this supermassive black hole:
MBH = 2.6×106 × MSUN = 5.15×1036 kg
A quasar is a very energetic and distant active galactic
nucleus; they are the most luminous objects in the universe. A quasar is a
compact region in the center of a massive galaxy surrounding its central
gigantic black hole.
An interesting way is to categorize galaxies, by the
activity they display at their core. By this measure, quasars rule supreme.
There are extremely distant galaxies that blast out as much light as the entire
Milky Way, producing a torrent of radiation from their core. This means there
are gigantic black holes in the center of each of those galaxies; the most
luminous quasars radiate at a rate that can exceed the output of average
galaxies, equivalent to one trillion (1012) suns.
That is why I consider when the core of a gigantic black hole
(MG) attains the Planck density the core will ‘evaporate’ trough a
burst of gamma rays, named quasar.
A proof of my theory: when a galaxy is young and the black
hole attains the mass MG starts the gamma rays burst and interacting with the ‘dust’ the galaxy
become luminous for long time because the black hole grows very fast having a
lot of mass around. Until the light will cross that galaxy (years) we will see
the quasar.
After the gamma
rays burst the black hole will have
less mass and after couple billion years will attain the MG but
now the gamma ray burst will be for short period of time because not too much
mass around to grow fast and no dust in the galaxy to become luminous.
The question is: when a burst of gamma rays will come from
the black hole that is in the center of our galaxy?
A proof of my theory: in the last 4 billion years was not
any burst of gamma rays towards our planet from the Milky Way’s supermassive
black hole(who is not big enough) that is why we are here today and in the last
couple thousands years isn’t any record of huge burst of gamma rays in our
galaxy.
The Big Bang
The Big Bang is the dominant (and highly supported) theory
of the origin of the universe.
The observable universe consists of the galaxies and other
matter that we can in principle observe from Earth because light from those
objects has had time to reach us since the beginning of the cosmological
expansion.
The total mass for the observable universe is Muniverse = 3.35×1054 kg; this is an estimation based on critical density.
Because the gravity can not compress the universe beyond the
Planck density the minimum volume of the Universe Vmin is equal with
the mass of the Universe divided by the Planck density: Vmin = Muniverse / Pdensity
Vmin = 3.35×1054 kg / 5.15500×1096 kg/m3 = 6.498545×10-43 m3
This means no singularity, energy is not infinite, density
is not infinite, volume is not zero, and space time curvature is not infinite.
If was a Big Crunch the previous Universe collapsed to a
volume very close to Vmin and our Universe started with a Big Bang from
that volume. In this case the Big Bang is cyclic and the size of the Universe
can not go under 6.498545×10-43 m3.
If our Universe started from an initial point or singularity
beyond the Planck wall when he entered in the quantum world he had this volume
Vmin and started the Big Bang from that volume.
Inside the Vmin the temperature is 1.416785 × 1032 K and the pressure
is 4.63309 × 10113 Pa.
Big Bang: What Banged?
Banged the volume Vmin or a volume very close to Vmin if before was a Big Crunch.
Conclusions:
My contributions are: I explained why there aren’t
singularities inside the black holes, isn’t event horizon and light can
‘escape’ from the black hole.
I explained when a black hole can generate a gamma ray
burst, a quasar; I revealed a new theory for quasars.
I answered to this essential question:
Big Bang: What Banged?
|